Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Luxoft (3.9/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RFPs needing hardware, firmware, and cloud scope under one vendor. Luxoft is the stronger option for automotive RFPs needing infotainment/digital cockpit scope at DXC scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Zug, Switzerland |
| Team size | 200+ | 18,000 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Offers all three standard engagement models (consulting, staff aug, end-to-end delivery) under one ISO-certified quality system spanning electrical through cloud | Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Embedded Linux, Android Automotive, C/C++ |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Automotive |
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is a 200+ person embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007, headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. For an RFP evaluator, the relevant service-scope detail is that Lemberg offers all three standard engagement models — technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development — under a single ISO 9001/ISO 27001/ISO 13485-certified quality system, spanning electrical engineering, PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, connectivity, edge AI, and cybersecurity. Named semiconductor partnerships (NXP, Microchip, STMicroelectronics as primary partners) and a documented in-house hardware lab back the technical claims, and named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) give procurement teams checkable references. Full IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery, a standard RFP requirement this firm meets without qualification.
Luxoft
Luxoft, founded in 2000, became a recognized automotive software systems integrator before DXC Technology acquired it in 2019. DXC states its automotive software already powers over 50 million vehicles and that DXC partners with 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers. For an RFP evaluator, the practical due-diligence question is whether pre-acquisition Luxoft's automotive specialization survived integration into DXC's much larger enterprise IT portfolio — worth confirming directly during vendor qualification rather than assuming from the brand name.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Automotive |
| Best use cases | Multi-lot RFPs needing hardware, firmware, and cloud scope consolidated under one vendor to reduce integration risk, Regulated-industry procurement requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management | In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit RFPs needing Android Automotive expertise, OEM procurement wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | All three standard RFP engagement models (consulting, staff aug, full delivery) available under one certified vendor, simplifying multi-lot procurement |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications map directly to common RFP compliance requirements for medical, security, and quality-managed programs |
| + | Named semiconductor partnerships (NXP, Microchip, STMicroelectronics) plus a documented hardware lab support technical due diligence |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer on delivery — a standard RFP requirement met without exception clauses |
| + | Named, checkable references (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) support procurement reference-checking |
| - | Does not manufacture at scale — RFPs requiring a single vendor through mass production will need a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not carry regulatory certification itself — provides documentation and support, but the client retains ownership of the certification process |
| - | No published rate card or minimum engagement figure — budget qualification requires a direct RFI or discovery call before a formal RFP |
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers |
| + | Recently announced AMBER in-vehicle infotainment platform demonstrates continued product investment post-DXC acquisition |
| + | Nearly 18,000-person international workforce across 44 cities supports globally distributed RFP programs |
| - | Acquired by DXC Technology in 2019 — confirm directly whether pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration into DXC's larger portfolio |
| - | Automotive-only embedded focus means no relevant track record outside the automotive procurement category |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: multi-lot RFPs needing hardware, firmware, and cloud scope consolidated under one vendor to reduce integration risk.
Offers all three standard engagement models (consulting, staff aug, end-to-end delivery) under one ISO-certified quality system spanning electrical through cloud. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: in-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit RFPs needing Android Automotive expertise.
Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Luxoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Luxoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Luxoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Luxoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-lot RFPs needing hardware, firmware, and cloud scope consolidated under one vendor to reduce integration risk | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Regulated-industry procurement requiring ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aligned quality management | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit RFPs needing Android Automotive expertise | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| OEM procurement wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Development projects. Offers all three standard engagement models (consulting, staff aug, end-to-end delivery) under one ISO-certified quality system spanning electrical through cloud.
Luxoft (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need OEM procurement wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers. If your situation matches that, Luxoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Luxoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: all three standard RFP engagement models (consulting, staff aug, full delivery) available under one certified vendor, simplifying multi-lot procurement. Luxoft's strongest advantage: automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Luxoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Luxoft uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Luxoft?
Luxoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Luxoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: offers all three standard engagement models (consulting, staff aug, end-to-end delivery) under one ISO-certified quality system spanning electrical through cloud. Luxoft's primary differentiator is: automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 18,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.